1997-05-01 - Re: Rejecting Dialog with Government Vermin

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: kent@songbird.com (Kent Crispin)
Message Hash: c4e84cc2971e9a9d60df12aced6851b79b9aeeb33ae0b4c064bbe008b78c172d
Message ID: <199705012209.RAA01168@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <19970429183938.08726@bywater.songbird.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-01 22:18:27 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 06:18:27 +0800

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 06:18:27 +0800
To: kent@songbird.com (Kent Crispin)
Subject: Re: Rejecting Dialog with Government Vermin
In-Reply-To: <19970429183938.08726@bywater.songbird.com>
Message-ID: <199705012209.RAA01168@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> On Tue, Apr 29, 1997 at 06:03:43PM -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> > Think of it this way: there are tactical and strategic decisions.
> > Strategically, I would like the Federal government to evolve into a form
> > that's consistent with the principles of individual freedom, peace, and
> > limited government enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

	>><SNIP><<

> To put a finer point on it, what flaw existed (exists) in the founding

	People. They are the flaw. The Constitution relies on the voters 
being rational, or at least putting the country before themselves. 

	Stupid assumption.

> fathers dream and actualization that prevented it from being a stable
> condition?






Thread