From: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: c605f6216f0fdddb491603e777796570e6a9e36e64da965a42adbe5e2ae0a29c
Message ID: <199705251654.LAA24764@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-25 17:47:11 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 01:47:11 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 01:47:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: SSZ Lag Test (fwd)
Message-ID: <199705251654.LAA24764@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Forwarded message:
> From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>
> Date: Sun, 25 May 97 11:05:39 -0500
> Subject: SSZ Lag Test
>
Timing responces from SSZ should probably be averaged about 8-10 times a day
for about a week to get a good idea of what to expect. The majority of the
time the system is not heavily using the ISDN nor are many users logged in.
However, two of my users transmit large blocks of data (one is video and the
other is a web-spider) w/o warning and make a significant impact. We also
tend to have very spikey web access.
Jim Choate
?
ravage@ssz.com
Return to May 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”