From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: c92d929941fbfa6883f5b17c17619dc41d577750737e82fc4ca0ba83509880d3
Message ID: <199705240056.TAA21591@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-24 01:42:41 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 09:42:41 +0800
From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 09:42:41 +0800
To: cypherpunks@EINSTEIN.ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: Police & military access (fwd)
Message-ID: <199705240056.TAA21591@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Forwarded message:
> Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 15:12:54 -0700
> From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
> Subject: Re: Police & military access
> >This would seem to support Jim Choate's general position. (Though I have my
> >own skepticism that many jurisdictions think it is true.)
>
> Jim Choate's messages about cops and "civil rights" suggest that he's not
> familiar with and/or interested in the basics of legal research.
> Restrictions (and lack of restrictions) related to use of force, power to
> arest, possession/use of weapons, etc., are mostly statutory. You can't
> find them (or understand them) by starting with only the Constitution, and
> then reasoning and deducing things from it.
Absolutely, but those statutes MUST be referencable back to the
Constitution. Something I freely admit is not the current case. If it were
the current case this would be a very quite mailing list indeed.
What a citizen can and can't do with a weapon is covered in the 2nd. It
includes police. If I as a citizen can't have object x then a police officer
can't have it, constitutionaly.
> >From a moral or political perspective, (e.g., what *should* the
> relationship between cops and citizens look like) what he writes is
> perfectly reasonable. From a legal perspective (what is the law today?)
> it's incomplete and thereby misleading.
Absolutely, and if you are infering that I at any time in my life have EVER
asserted that my speculation was the case then you need to take a reading
comprehension course (as well as reflect on what the entire discussion on
cypherpunks truly is at the core).
What *should* be the case is the whole damn point.
Jim Choate
CyberTects
ravage@ssz.com
Return to May 1997
Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>”
1997-05-24 (Sat, 24 May 1997 09:42:41 +0800) - Re: Police & military access (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>