From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d67b350225e3995b4671e0c1e5fde1789e0321ece722acd84688777e8de1c638
Message ID: <199705150241.EAA25822@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: <01BC603F.4B529240@pc1901.ibpinc.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-15 03:58:28 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 11:58:28 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 11:58:28 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous Remailers
In-Reply-To: <01BC603F.4B529240@pc1901.ibpinc.com>
Message-ID: <199705150241.EAA25822@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Yes, you are missing a lot. The bit about foreign inteligence agencies is
almost certainly a canard created by one Strassman at a conference in
Boston 2 years ago, then retracted. Anyway, if you use chaining, it's
irrelevant.
See
<A HREF="http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/ocean.htm">
http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/ocean.htm
</A> and
<A HREF="http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/arbitr.htm">
http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/arbitr.htm
</A>
for the gory details.
Note that I use a remailer beacause this group may be gatewayed to Usenet
and I am trying to keep down the spam...
On Wed, 14 May 1997, Roger J. Jones wrote:
> Why is it that some who are very concerned about their personal privacy utilize anonymous remailers that:
>
> 1) Log all of their mail messages?
> 2) Are in many cases reputed to be run by foreign intelligence services?
>
> Do they really trust the owner of the remailer? (Unless of course, it is their remailer?) I seem to be missing something.
>
A. Michael Froomkin | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law | "Cyberspace" is not a place.
U. Miami School of Law |
P.O. Box 248087 | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's warm here.
Return to May 1997
Return to “tzeruch@ceddec.com”