From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
To: Declan McCullagh <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: eb5ae17101d67204ad01a95d68da82276600dff46a936f92f8debe88758402f2
Message ID: <v03007800af9998986ef4@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply To: <v03007805af99743aebb7@[168.161.105.191]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-10 02:44:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 10:44:25 +0800
From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 10:44:25 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Bill of Goods, from The Netly News Network
In-Reply-To: <v03007805af99743aebb7@[168.161.105.191]>
Message-ID: <v03007800af9998986ef4@[207.167.93.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 4:42 PM -0800 5/9/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>************
>
>http://pathfinder.com/netly/editorial/0,1012,931,00.html
>
>The Netly News Network
>http://netlynews.com/
>May 9, 1997
>
>Bill of Goods
>by Declan McCullagh (declan@well.com)
...
> It's diabolical. Researchers already have to
>comply with a legion of rules to qualify for grants.
>Kerrey's proposed bill, called "The Secure Public
>Network Act," would add yet another provision to the
...
> But the real question is: Why does Kerrey think
>this rat-bastard bill has any chance of passing
>through Congress, especially when there's already
>legislation that would generally relax controls on
>crypto? After all, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.)'s "SAFE"
>bill already has 86 cosponsors and shot out of
>subcommittee last week. Sen. Conrad Burns' (R-Mont.)
>"Pro-CODE" bill is headed for markup next month.
>
> The answer is simple: this a trading chit that
>the White House and the Democratic leadership can play
>to water down the Burns and Goodlatte bills, and
>perhaps meld all three together.
>House party line: "The President has put forward a
>plan which in good faith attempts to balance our
>nation's interests in commerce, security, and law
>enforcement."
My hearty congratulations to Declan for this strong stance against the
Kerrey treason. I'm glad to see his strong criticism of it, and his
accurate speculation that a "grand compromise" with the criminals is likely.
I doubt one of his employers, "Time," will use his analysis...much too
radical for their get along/go along policy.
As for the fucking bureacrats, the Founding Fathers had it exactly right:
"Death to Tyrants!"
(Sadly, in these last decades of the American Nation, the scum will view
this as a "threat." Fuck em. Better, vaporize their nest.)
--Tim May, still a felon under their treasonous laws
There's something wrong when I'm a felon under an increasing number of laws.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
Return to May 1997
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”