From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 001583e6c47608cd68a1eeff662b6cce1dca8d5cbd9fc0daf82b20e8216bed7c
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19970614201321.009a8b38@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-14 20:33:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 04:33:58 +0800
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 04:33:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: IBM sues critics?
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970614201321.009a8b38@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Secret Squirrel wrote:
>According to a usually reliable contact in a position to know, IBM Friday
>filed a liable suit against the 11 authors of the study
>titled "The risks of key recovery, key escrow and trusted third-party
>encryption" plus their employers and the Centere for Democracy and
>Technology, which sponsored the report. According to my contact, IBM
>feels that the report directly targets their own key recovery system,
>and falsely implies that it isn't reliable. They are asking for
>unspecified damages.
If this report is true it's worth taking a look at IBM's policy paper
"The need for a global cryptographic policy framework" to
understand why the key study report is such a threat to
Blue's global market strategy:
http://www.ibm.com/security/html/pp_global.html
IBM's economic incentive to attack the report is substantial, not
least because it hopes to garner the lion's share of global GAK --
not that that's news.
Return to June 1997
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1997-06-14 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 04:33:58 +0800) - Re: IBM sues critics? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>