From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
To: Vinnie Moscaritolo <vinnie@webstuff.apple.com>
Message Hash: 1041333c70cc44aa060fc6a8a1764fefb3720c75f50fc15fb3d41ac1bab06030
Message ID: <v03007816afb9562a15c9@[207.94.249.152]>
Reply To: <v030209f4afb5cb93e95a@[139.167.130.247]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-03 06:01:29 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 14:01:29 +0800
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 14:01:29 +0800
To: Vinnie Moscaritolo <vinnie@webstuff.apple.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on the Macintosh
In-Reply-To: <v030209f4afb5cb93e95a@[139.167.130.247]>
Message-ID: <v03007816afb9562a15c9@[207.94.249.152]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Vinnie wrote:
>Tim,.I am suprised to hear you whining with such a liberals voice.. I
>always thought that demanding memory protection in an OS is a lot like
>demanding that the government is responsible for protecting you from
>anything that might go bad.. If applications are well written, then you
>really dont need the memory partitions in a personal computer.
Hi Vinnie. I'm with Tim on this one. While I have strong feelings about
locking up people, I have no compunctions at all about locking up
program-instances. If I can contain the instances, and especially keep
them limited in their file access, I can do a bunch to control viruses and
other nasties. (BTW - Linux, like all Unixes is piss poor at limiting file
system access.)
Best Regards - Bill
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | The Internet was designed | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | to protect the free world | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | from hostile governments. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to June 1997
Return to “Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>”
Unknown thread root