cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-06-23 - Re: New PGP signatures

Header Data

From: Rick Osborne <osborne@gateway.grumman.com>
To: cypherpunks mailing list <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Message Hash: 119fb0505263f2c50608861b34313c6f75a0f5938229e777a02c04575cf18fe0
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970623133802.009b2800@gateway.grumman.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970623055041.2746A-100000@sirius.infonex.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-23 17:47:14 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 01:47:14 +0800

Raw message

From: Rick Osborne <osborne@gateway.grumman.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 01:47:14 +0800
To: cypherpunks mailing list <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Subject: Re: New PGP signatures
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970623055041.2746A-100000@sirius.infonex.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970623133802.009b2800@gateway.grumman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



bennett_t1@popmail.firn.edu wrote:
>some asshole forgot to make PGP 5.0 freeware RSA key-generating

Okay, silly question here, but what's to stop someone from adding that
capability once the source is available?  (And if they knew they were going
to publish the source, why not just add the capability in the first place?)
-- Rick Osborne, <osborne@gateway,grumman.com>
"Unbelievable!  Even over the air waves, this Senator person eminates
evil as if it were musk!"
-- Gates, Legion of Superheroes

Thread