From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: geeman@best.com
Message Hash: 40338a9657f52193972fe325172bbf3a3a1f10602330822c61a608fad4369295
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19970629150513.0068c8f0@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-30 05:29:47 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 13:29:47 +0800
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 13:29:47 +0800
To: geeman@best.com
Subject: Re: details of 6/26 action on HR 695??
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970629150513.0068c8f0@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
geeman@best.com wrote:
>Are these the same amendments from before, or new ones?
The H.R.695 amendments referred to in the Congressional Record
appear to be the same ones described in House Report 105-108:
http://jya.com/hr105-108.txt
If there are others they have not yet been published.
----------
>Congressional Record: June 26, 1997 (House)]
>[Page H4834]
>From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
>[DOCID:cr26jn97-74]
>
>
> REPORTED BILL SEQUENTIALLY REFERRED
>
> Under clause 5 of rule X, the following action was taken by the
>Speaker:
>
> H.R. 695. A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to
> affirm the rights of U.S. persons to use and sell encryption
> and to relax export controls on encryption; with an
> amendment; referred to the Committees on Commerce, National
> Security, and the Permanent Select Committee on intelligence
> for a period ending not later than September 5, 1997, for
> consideration of such provisions of the bill and amendment
> reported by the Committee on the Judiciary as fall within the
> jurisdiction of those committees pursuant to clause 1(e) and
> (k), rule X and rule XLVIII, respectively.
>
Return to June 1997
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1997-06-30 (Mon, 30 Jun 1997 13:29:47 +0800) - Re: details of 6/26 action on HR 695?? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>