1997-06-10 - Re: Thoughtcrime [Lisa Bonet Ramsey]

Header Data

From: lucifer@dhp.com (lucifer Anonymous Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 701ae8987e931cbd6070ede820a9f9d0337ef44d197a777d930fc4fbbe8518dc
Message ID: <199706101001.GAA09197@dhp.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-10 10:12:36 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 18:12:36 +0800

Raw message

From: lucifer@dhp.com (lucifer Anonymous Remailer)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 18:12:36 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Thoughtcrime   [Lisa Bonet Ramsey]
Message-ID: <199706101001.GAA09197@dhp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Tim May wrote:
> 
> Precisely. The laws are designed to go after the thoughts. Synthetic
> images, images of little girls in leotards. images of teenagers of legal
> age *in the countries of origin*...none of these involve acts of sexual
> congress with a child in violation of the laws of the U.S. The only crime
> is thoughtcrime.

 I couldn't help but notice from the TV reports that Lisa Bonet
Ramsey was a pretty hot little number. Has Peter Jennings been 
arrested yet for his part in the national media helping to spread
child pornography? Kookie Roberts?
 What if I send the FBI a picture of myself pulling my pud while
watching young Lisa strutting her stuff on the ten o'clock news?
Will the newscasters be imprisoned for conspiracy in my thought
crime?

> As for whether it is "sick" to be sexually attracted to an "underage"
> person, I sure do recall being attracted to a lot of the girls in high
> school, and they were certainly nearly all "underaged."

 Mother Nature was undoubtably a co-conspirator in your criminal
thoughts. If you had been charged you probably could have eased 
your sentence by ratting her out.

A. Perv






Thread