From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 82e157cf32682b309315a4f4da7b466be1d2119d7025b63828cc34c232c62812
Message ID: <199706121630.JAA27386@fat.doobie.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-12 16:47:22 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 00:47:22 +0800
From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 00:47:22 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Flag burning vote TOMORROW and government-imposed ratings
Message-ID: <199706121630.JAA27386@fat.doobie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 12 Jun 1997, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
> Jut woke up, but I would argue "no." This would be the first
> constitutional weakening of the First Amendment ever. Hardly a move that
> strengthens free speech protections.
First constitutional weakening yes, but hardly the first weakening. :(
What about virtual flag burning? Any Javafolks out there wanting to
protest could write a nice "Click Here to Burn the Flag of these here
United States... Just like Vince's Be a Crypto Runner page."
Flaming Flag Monger Citizen Unit #401598424628
Return to June 1997
Return to “nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)”
1997-06-12 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 00:47:22 +0800) - Re: Flag burning vote TOMORROW and government-imposed ratings - nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)