1997-06-27 - Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes II

Header Data

From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
To: Declan McCullagh <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Message Hash: 8cd703920e8c6a30ddc6e2d58e0f3faa63303106f4a2c680b9cdb9d8446b902f
Message ID: <v03007817afd8fb14a226@[207.94.249.169]>
Reply To: <199706242233.XAA00222@server.test.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-27 05:42:37 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 13:42:37 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 13:42:37 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes II
In-Reply-To: <199706242233.XAA00222@server.test.net>
Message-ID: <v03007817afd8fb14a226@[207.94.249.169]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 9:25 PM -0700 6/24/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>At 23:33 +0100 6/24/97, Adam Back wrote:
>>I don't think we can explain it any more technically and expect it to
>>be useful to a journalist.
>
>...
>
>Now, I don't want to start a "who's the geekiest geek" contest, since y'all
>will win hands-down -- but I want to point out that while we may not be
>crypto-whizzes, not all of us are entirely clueless either.

I'm not worried about the journalist-with-a-clue.  I am worried about Joe
citizen (the restless "sheepie").  I believe deep in my heart that if Joe
citizen understood the issue, he'd say, "No way am I going to let some
government bastard paw through my personal business."  Based on this
belief, I applaud Adam's attempt to explain the crypto issues in simple
language.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The Internet was designed  | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     | to protect the free world  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | from hostile governments.  | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread