From: “Peter Nicol - VRL / BroomStick Productions” <nicol@highway1.com.au>
To: whgiii@amaranth.com
Message Hash: 8d60e2ecfd44c1e498d06bf96e758e4eaff3438a010ca80ef1cbf4da257870ef
Message ID: <199706121821.CAA28599@hedgehog.highway1.com.au>
Reply To: <199706121722.BAA27903@hedgehog.highway1.com.au>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-12 18:36:17 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 02:36:17 +0800
From: "Peter Nicol - VRL / BroomStick Productions" <nicol@highway1.com.au>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 02:36:17 +0800
To: whgiii@amaranth.com
Subject: Re: Secrecy?
In-Reply-To: <199706121722.BAA27903@hedgehog.highway1.com.au>
Message-ID: <199706121821.CAA28599@hedgehog.highway1.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> >Hmmmm . . .
>
> >After following this list for a while I offer the following observation:
>
> >"Would it be better to DEMAND the full disclosure of the governments
> >secrets rather than scramble around trying to keep ours."
>
> >I am prepared to allow governments full access to my
> >communications when they allow me full access to theirs.
>
> Well I for one am not.
>
> What the government does is our business as they work for us. We have
> every right to DEMAND full acess to what they are doing.
>
> The government does not have the right to access to what it's citizens are
> doing.
>
Hmmm . . . "The Govenment" or "GovernmentS" . . . perhaps a fine
point.
> This is a simple boss-employee relationship and the government is *NOT*
> the boss.
Ugly! I do not enter into boss-employee relationships as either the
boss or the employee. I work/play WITH people FOR people as a node
in the network, not a part of the heirarchy. Ummm . . . You seem to
have missed/not quoted the other part of my post.
Peter Nicol
Global Media Magnet
nicol@iap.net.au
019 111 943 (OZ)
"Nonlinear models differ form linear ones in a number of ways.
Rather than trying to figure out all the chains of causality,
the modeler looks for nodes where feedback loops join and tries
to capture as many of the important loops as possible in the
system's "picture." Rather than shaping the model to make a
forecast about future events or to exercise some central
control, the nonlinear modeller is content to perturb
the model, trying out different variations in order to
learn about the system's critical points and its homeostasis
(resitance to change). The modeler is not seeking to
control the complex system by quantifying it and mastering
its causality; she wants to increase her "intuitions"
about how the system works so she can interact with
it more harmoniously."
- Turblulent Mirror
Return to June 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”