1997-06-24 - Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Message Hash: 91d9b803645aca65cc1c93a0a4621b73a3412131e350c1429121a2b102b8faad
Message ID: <v03007809afd5b9286e1d@[168.161.105.191]>
Reply To: <199706241351.OAA04279@hermes>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-24 18:38:38 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 02:38:38 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 02:38:38 +0800
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Comparing Cryptographic Key Sizes
In-Reply-To: <199706241351.OAA04279@hermes>
Message-ID: <v03007809afd5b9286e1d@[168.161.105.191]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Thanks, Adam, for sending this along.

As it turns out, I'm working on an article about encryption and privacy
that will appear in Time Magazine next month. Yesterday I photocopied a few
pages of Applied Crypto and printed out the (I believe) February 1996 paper
on recommended key lengths and passed them around the office. Your summary
is even more handy.

-Declan



-------------------------
Declan McCullagh
Time Inc.
The Netly News Network
Washington Correspondent
http://netlynews.com/







Thread