1997-06-20 - Re: (Fwd) New crypto bill clears committee

Header Data

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 97ee141949c3a893ed2561fcea5e25809cdacbd746684127269accd4fffefdb9
Message ID: <v030209adafd0b165e2e1@[139.167.130.247]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-20 22:29:43 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 06:29:43 +0800

Raw message

From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 06:29:43 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: (Fwd) New crypto bill clears committee
Message-ID: <v030209adafd0b165e2e1@[139.167.130.247]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




--- begin forwarded text


X-Authentication-Warning: fma66.fma.com: majordomo set sender to
owner-espam@lists.espace.net using -f
X-Orig-From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
X-e$pam-source: owner-cryptography@c2.net
X-Sender: rah@atanda.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 17:00:33 -0400
To: espam@intertrader.com, e$pam <e$pam@atanda.com>
From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Subject: Re: (Fwd) New crypto bill clears committee
Sender: owner-espam@lists.espace.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: e$@thumper.vmeng.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This mail is brought to you by the e$pam mailing list
---------------------------------------------------------------------

owner-cryptography@c2.org using -f
X-Sender: rah@atanda.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 15:15:58 -0400
To: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Subject: Re: (Fwd) New crypto bill clears committee
Cc: cryptography@c2.net
Sender: owner-cryptography@c2.net

> At 7:56 AM -0400 6/20/97, Adam Shostack wrote:
 > I plan to spend a substaintial portion of my day explaining to the
 > large companies I consult with that this is a very bad thing, and they
 > should be opposing its advance.

 Said syllogistically,

 Digital Commerce *is* Financial Cryptography,
 Financial Cryptography *is* Strong Cryptography,
 therefore,
 Digital Commerce *is* Strong Cryptography.
 and therefore,
 No Strong Cryptography, no Digital Commerce.


 Instructions for the use of this syllogism:

 Invite 'em to a presentation.

 Use one proposition per slide, with nothing on the slide but the
 proposition, centered vertically and horizontally. Don't make handouts.

 Put up the first slide, and defend the proposition.
 Repeat until last slide.

 Ask for questions.

 The bill is in the mail. ;-).

 QED,
 RAH


 -----------------
 Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox
 e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
 "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
 [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
 experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
 The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Where people, networks and money come together: Consult Hyperion
http://www.hyperion.co.uk                    info@hyperion.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Like e$? Help pay for it!  See <http://www.shipwright.com/beg.html>
Or, for e$/e$pam sponsorship, <mailto:rah@shipwright.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------

--- end forwarded text



-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/







Thread