From: Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: a7b5c9da83b8585daf1d1d7f1d7be91ff9bbc3a2b301dbb223cd9f7974cafdad
Message ID: <19970617011917.5241.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-17 01:42:24 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:42:24 +0800
From: Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:42:24 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Homer on Terrorism
Message-ID: <19970617011917.5241.qmail@squirrel.owl.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Of course it was blackmail. The reason people are confused about this is
they assume that blackmail is bad.
Blackmail is good. The alternative is releasing the damaging information.
Blackmail gives the person who has something to hide a chance to keep the
information quiet. He has more options than he would have in a system
where blackmail was impossible.
Laws against blackmail are even more senseless than laws against libel.
In the case of blackmail, the supposed victim is asking not to be allowed
to take actions which are in his own self interest, a classic case of protecting
someone from himself.
Fortunately, cryptography will liberate blackmail just as it will other forms
of communications.
BlackMonger
Return to June 1997
Return to “Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>”
1997-06-17 (Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:42:24 +0800) - Re: Homer on Terrorism - Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>