1997-06-19 - None Re: Receiving Messages Anonymously
Header Data
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: aa049f2993cc9d90e66e0161b3147d9949e4078bea52ed977977659ac2ea6840
Message ID: <199706190425.GAA27164@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: <v02140b01afcbb73285d2@[206.184.194.206]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-19 04:32:36 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 12:32:36 +0800
Raw message
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 12:32:36 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: None Re: Receiving Messages Anonymously
In-Reply-To: <v02140b01afcbb73285d2@[206.184.194.206]>
Message-ID: <199706190425.GAA27164@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
pdh@best.com (Peter Hendrickson) wrote:
> Receiving anonymous messages is still an open problem. The solutions
> we have so far are cumbersome to operate. They also depend on a chain
> of machines remaining up and reliable for a long time, which is
> expensive.
>
> A quick solution is to use the list to send anonymous messages. It is
> inexpensive to tell if a message is encrypted for a key you control so
> it is cheap to find messages you can read.
An anonymous message pool. How is this different from posting to
alt.anonymous.messages? (Other than it would annoy list readers. :)
Thread
Return to June 1997
- Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
Return to “pdh@best.com (Peter Hendrickson)”
- 1997-06-17 (Tue, 17 Jun 1997 11:04:32 +0800) - Receiving Messages Anonymously - pdh@best.com (Peter Hendrickson)
- 1997-06-19 (Thu, 19 Jun 1997 12:32:36 +0800) - None Re: Receiving Messages Anonymously - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
- 1997-06-19 (Thu, 19 Jun 1997 15:34:40 +0800) - Re: Receiving Messages Anonymously - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)