From: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: be452cd6e05486ae5c0c22ff8e62767d9cb222c5b805a6cf2bbf58ce6508d09f
Message ID: <v0300780fafd1a6343843@[163.176.132.90]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-23 09:07:25 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 17:07:25 +0800
From: Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 17:07:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: recoverability
Message-ID: <v0300780fafd1a6343843@[163.176.132.90]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Although there is still talks much about key escrow/mgmt/recovery, the
policy on KMI recoverable products appears to be framed in terms of
plaintext recovery. E.g., at a BXA crypto reg seminar, the handout used
the following def'n:
"Products which allow government officials to obtain, under proper legal
authority and without the cooperation or knowledge of the user, the
plaintext of the encrypted data and communications."
Lee
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBM645jbk2KqHYSFEtEQKFIQCbBiazwaIWeWM28iLHOKIInzCj+nAAn3oj
9OddweX2M+fIa47cigevhiR1
=YuHD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to June 1997
Return to “Lee Tien <tien@well.com>”
1997-06-23 (Mon, 23 Jun 1997 17:07:25 +0800) - recoverability - Lee Tien <tien@well.com>