From: Jenjen <jsong@aig.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bf05bbbecfb8ee21d4cdf18bfabe48d759c96a842db8870e248c45e971478e3a
Message ID: <33989243.77E7@aig.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-06 22:48:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 06:48:07 +0800
From: Jenjen <jsong@aig.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 1997 06:48:07 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Mixture Generation vs. Moduler Exponantion Approach?
Message-ID: <33989243.77E7@aig.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Recently I learned a new crypto algorithm--RPK (see www.rpk.co.nz).
It's based on mixture generator (MG) approach and claims much faster
than all existing public-key crypto-algorithms. But some people argue
that MG is not much different from moduler exponantiation (ME) approach,
which has been used in some existing crypto-algorithms. Therefore, RPK
may not be that much faster than others.
I'm new in this field and not sure whether these 2 approaches (Mixture
Generation vs. Moduler Exponantiation) are very different or not?
Can MG be much faster than ME or no much difference?
Would you help me with these questions or point me to a right direction?
I'd appreciate your help.
Return to June 1997
Return to “Jenjen <jsong@aig.com>”
1997-06-06 (Sat, 7 Jun 1997 06:48:07 +0800) - Mixture Generation vs. Moduler Exponantion Approach? - Jenjen <jsong@aig.com>