1997-06-12 - Re: Flag burning vote TOMORROW and government-imposed ratings

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: declan@well.com (Declan McCullagh)
Message Hash: c253d67634114479e291551d143bd8698651066f13348b69055f5cba5624c03c
Message ID: <199706121208.IAA16778@homeport.org>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970611133503.12043H-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-12 12:30:26 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 20:30:26 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 20:30:26 +0800
To: declan@well.com (Declan McCullagh)
Subject: Re: Flag burning vote TOMORROW and government-imposed ratings
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970611133503.12043H-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <199706121208.IAA16778@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



| 	http://www.allpolitics.com/1997/gen/analysis/counterpoint/
| 
|         Counterpoint: Ban Flag Burning?
| 
|         It's baaaack.....! The House is set to vote June 12 on
| 	a proposed amendment to the Constitution that would
| 	ban flag desecration. Democratic Rep. William
| 	Lipinksi, a lead sponsor, says the flag is too
| 	important a symbol not to be protected, while ACLU
| 	executive director Ira Glasser warns against
| 	weakening the First Amendment.

	Would a Flag Burning Ammendment give the court clear guidance
that other offensive speech, not ammended against, is now more ok?

Adam



-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume







Thread