1997-06-21 - Re: CNNFN transcript – EPIC vs. Family Research Council on CDA

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
To: Huge Cajones Remailer <nobody@huge.cajones.com>
Message Hash: c9a2444595e1dd0c0707c4156f93af779825fb06e9f039fc078d79dbcceb2162
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970621130601.14633A-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
Reply To: <199706211620.JAA05418@fat.doobie.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-21 17:13:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 10:13:27 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 10:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: Huge Cajones Remailer <nobody@huge.cajones.com>
Subject: Re: CNNFN transcript -- EPIC vs. Family Research Council on CDA
In-Reply-To: <199706211620.JAA05418@fat.doobie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970621130601.14633A-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


First: If I were Rotenberg's press whore, I think I'd be fired quickly for
flaming him over wanting big government solutions, including new Federal
agencies, for privacy. 

Second: 20KB messages aren't unusual on cypherpunks. Don't like it, filter
it out, don't read it, unsubscribe. But don't whine about "spam." Get a
clue already.

Third: What I found interesting was Cathy's take on the upcoming CDA
ruling.

Fourth: I sense a bit of envy, Anonymous. What, "second-rate news shows"
like CNN-FN didn't call you for comment? 

-Declan


On Sat, 21 Jun 1997, Huge Cajones Remailer wrote:

> So when did you turn into Rotenberg's press whore?  This 20k transcript
> you just spammed me with is no different than a hundred other mediocre
> debates on second-rate news shows that we have all been subjected to since
> people started whining about the CDA. Boring.
> 
> 
> 
> 






Thread