1997-06-23 - Re: CP uses for the PGP 5.0 source

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: Steve Schear <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: de567a23b4e6fdf7aa37e8a88a18f29cd9eb0199bf45be3b577551cbd0967c4f
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970622170551.0076d690@netcom9.netcom.com>
Reply To: <v03102800afd3687f206a@[10.0.2.15]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-23 00:11:49 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 08:11:49 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 08:11:49 +0800
To: Steve Schear <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: CP uses for the PGP 5.0 source
In-Reply-To: <v03102800afd3687f206a@[10.0.2.15]>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970622170551.0076d690@netcom9.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 04:41 PM 6/22/97 -0700, Steve Schear wrote:
>1. Remailer:  One reason remailers haven't been as popular as we've hoped
>is the need to operate separate, sometime difficult to use, remailer client
>software.  By integrating these and other functions into plug-ins, creation
>of persistant identities and integration with key generation and management
>can be simplified.

Type I remailers were a nice proof of concept. Nothing more. What you want
is a Mixmaster client similar to PGP 5.0. I doubt the PGP source will be of
much help for this task.

>2. Digital postage: 

Has nothing to do with PGP. A different problem entirely.

[...]
>ECash could really supply an economic shot in the arm for remailers, making
>possible commercial (read profitable) remailers.  It will also offer a
>ready-made market for accountless ecash, which will be available soon.
>Jeremey Barrett's higher level ecash API should greatly simplify ecash
>integration.

Amen. What's the ETA?

Thanks,

--Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
  PGP encrypted mail preferred.
  DES is dead! Please join in breaking RC5-56.
  http://rc5.distributed.net/






Thread