1997-06-06 - Re: IRS Hit
Header Data
From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
To: Jim Burnes <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Message Hash: df90f9f0b9572cf97f02a3a633234e2d3dee6cb1867a04d9d7914204df82ae49
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970605170523.00886470@mail.io.com>
Reply To: <199706051429.JAA02097@mailhub.amaranth.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-06 00:35:49 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 08:35:49 +0800
Raw message
From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 08:35:49 +0800
To: Jim Burnes <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Subject: Re: IRS Hit
In-Reply-To: <199706051429.JAA02097@mailhub.amaranth.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970605170523.00886470@mail.io.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 04:59 PM 6/5/97 -0600, Jim Burnes wrote:
>The defendant is perfectly able to bring charges in this matter against
>James Dolan personally. There is precedent in this. If my read of
>the judge is accurate he is saying, "go after him because he was acting
>outside his office".
>
>I can't remember the exact name of this decision, but I think it was
>something like "so-and-so vs. 5 unnamed FBI officers".
It's _Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents_, 403 US 388 (1971),
or <http://www.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=403&invol=388>.
--
Greg Broiles | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell:
gbroiles@netbox.com |
http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto.
Thread
Return to June 1997
- Return to “Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>”
- Return to “Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>”
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”
- 1997-06-05 (Thu, 5 Jun 1997 22:54:19 +0800) - Re: IRS Hit - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-05 (Fri, 6 Jun 1997 07:11:17 +0800) - Re: IRS Hit - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
- 1997-06-06 (Fri, 6 Jun 1997 08:35:49 +0800) - Re: IRS Hit - Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
- 1997-06-06 (Fri, 6 Jun 1997 11:57:14 +0800) - Re: IRS Hit - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>