cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-06-19 - Re: Recipient Anonymity

Header Data

From: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: e032f8e499e122e5ffff1c57e1fb860575208af8b62464dd4565df369838f6fd
Message ID: <m0wenxZ-0003b9C@ulf.mali.sub.org>
Reply To: <199706180825.BAA20903@myriad.alias.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-19 20:59:44 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 04:59:44 +0800

Raw message

From: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 04:59:44 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Recipient Anonymity
In-Reply-To: <199706180825.BAA20903@myriad.alias.net>
Message-ID: <m0wenxZ-0003b9C@ulf.mali.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>Except for the additional server-to-server communications necessary to
>broadcast new messages into the system, the bandwidth utilization is
>comparable to sender-anonymous remailers; it scales linearly as the
>number of parties involved in the delivery of a particular message.

How are messages selected?  It seems that the recipient needs to know
the message IDs of all messages in the system, and must have a way to
identify his messages.

Thread