From: ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: tcmay@got.net (Tim May)
Message Hash: fef9337cb75ec437dd759ea99672e6f6cef9c18eb9c1e16fac08ed9082ae286e
Message ID: <199706100422.XAA03115@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <v03102813afc280fe6067@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-10 04:34:00 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 12:34:00 +0800
From: ichudov@Algebra.COM (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 12:34:00 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Tim May)
Subject: Re: Thoughtcrime (Re: My War) (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <v03102813afc280fe6067@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <199706100422.XAA03115@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Tim May wrote:
> It's all very complicated. And strong crypto, of course, is on the verge of
> making the risk of getting caught near zero. You know the rest.
I do not think that it is "on the verge", rather, it is there already.
I have a business plan. It presumes that I can RECEIVE cash
anonymously and operate in a certain city. As far as I understand,
a modification of existing protocols allows to implement anonymity
of payees.
I open a trug trading center at, for example,
drugz@anonymous.mailserver.com. Alternatively, I can publish my public
key in alt.anonymous.messages.
Drug addicts would send me digital cash and specify which drugs they
wish to receive, and send me their public keys. I would place their
drugs in some random place in that city, and then send them (anonymously)
the location of the place so that they can pick it up.
I do not see how I can be detected, modulo the security of anonymous
remailers. Since my reputation will be based on PGP authentication, I
will have an incentive not to cheat.
- Igor.
P.S. I do not believe that anon remailers provide an adequate security.
Return to June 1997
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”