From: Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0d2997bf9b4ff01f769e9e8749579fb2055bc3fed50c8f435fdf12835616f5c7
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970703150410.29801G-100000@ece>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-03 19:15:47 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 03:15:47 +0800
From: Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 03:15:47 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: ISP signatures on outgoing mail
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970703150410.29801G-100000@ece>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 3 Jul 1997, Anonymous wrote:
> They need a standard for which headers to sign, then a dig sig can be
> included in the headers to check that a message came from where it
> claims.
this doesn't seem to help solve the problem very much. The way SMTP works
right now, spammers can frequently just connect to somebodies SMTP server,
drop off a load of e-mail, and let their server handle it. (identical to
how the ISPs customers drop off mail)
All we get out of this is a way to blame those who sign their mail and get
slammed by a spammer.
Funny, this wouldn't seem to hurt remailers all that much. You'd
basically guarantee that, yes, the mail really did come from the anonymous
remailer. :-)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ryan Anderson - <Pug Majere> "Who knows, even the horse might sing"
Wayne State University - CULMA "May you live in interesting times.."
randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu Ohio = VYI of the USA
PGP Fingerprint - 7E 8E C6 54 96 AC D9 57 E4 F8 AE 9C 10 7E 78 C9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to July 1997
Return to “Ryan Anderson <randerso@ece.eng.wayne.edu>”