1997-07-26 - Re: CDT, RSACi, and “public service” groups (1/3)

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 1f203b12a73b83d9be9385a074d79439e5be2f3291449d171e30f7186bccf2a4
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970725231642.24445D-100000@well.com>
Reply To: <v03007831afff25502610@[207.94.249.108]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-26 06:33:12 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 14:33:12 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 14:33:12 +0800
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: CDT, RSACi, and "public service" groups (1/3)
In-Reply-To: <v03007831afff25502610@[207.94.249.108]>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970725231642.24445D-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Heh. That's not what RSACi has in mind. :) --Declan

On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, Bill Frantz wrote:

> At 9:18 AM -0700 7/25/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> >RSAC-PS raises the same troubling questions as RSACnews: what is a "public
> >service" group? Who decides?
> 
> This question is easy to answer.  By being publicly available, they are ALL
> offering public services.  Therefore they are all free from
> mandatory/voluntary ratings.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Frantz       | The Internet was designed  | Periwinkle -- Consulting
> (408)356-8506     | to protect the free world  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
> frantz@netcom.com | from hostile governments.  | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
> 
> 
> 
> 






Thread