1997-07-17 - Re: FCPUNX:’The Failure to Do Your Job’ amendment (was Re: White House

Header Data

From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
To: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
Message Hash: 6085361c64113c19a690f3c3db872663be6aac8409faf626f1bff90a1b376eda
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970717110931.2219B-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: <199707170348.UAA19054@proxy4.ba.best.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-17 11:27:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 19:27:31 +0800

Raw message

From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 19:27:31 +0800
To: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Subject: Re: FCPUNX:'The Failure to Do Your Job' amendment (was Re: White House
In-Reply-To: <199707170348.UAA19054@proxy4.ba.best.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970717110931.2219B-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




> > A Constitutional amendment that would call for the impeachment of the
> > President for failing to veto any three bills that are overturned by the
> > Supreme Court on Constitutional grounds.
> 
> This however, presupposes that the supreme court is likely to veto
> unconstitutional bills, and refrain from vetoing constitutional
> bills.  

This also assumes that the supremes, knowing the president may be 
impeached on the 3rd overturned bill, would not be less likely to 
overturn it because of the political turmoil created. Also it assumes the 
supremes cannot be brought, by and large a president doesn`t care about 
individual bills, if his ass was on the line it would be a case for more 
desperate action on his part.

        Datacomms Technologies data security
       Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
  Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"







Thread