From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: cryptography@c2.net
Message Hash: 70274220da4d7de874ed4c784b004e798cc3e6b9cf4bd66af4ac38d35c814e18
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9707161252.A12693-0100000@netcom2>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-16 20:29:26 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 04:29:26 +0800
From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 1997 04:29:26 +0800
To: cryptography@c2.net
Subject: Attorneys: RSA patent invalid
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9707161252.A12693-0100000@netcom2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In a just published article in CyberLaw, patent attorneys Patrick Flinn
and James Jordan rise serious questions about the validity of the RSA
patent in the US. The authors conclude:
> Due largely to luck, bluster, and the naiveti of potential competitors,
the owner of United States Patent No. 4,405,829 has enjoyed a virtual
monopoly on all uses of the RSA Algorithm. However, a careful scrutiny of
the RSA Patent claims, and other details of its disclosure and
prosecution, reveal both significant limits to the scope of the patent
and material questions regarding its validity.
The full article can be found at http://www.cyberlaw.com/rsa.html
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred
Return to July 1997
Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>”
1997-07-16 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 04:29:26 +0800) - Attorneys: RSA patent invalid - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>