1997-07-29 - Will Spam For Food (Not Spam) / Re: Spare DigiCa$h? / Re: AN APPEAL TO THE HUMAN RACE

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7a7038a0d68c8659cb5bde22600887fd2881c3e4cfd947cebc66ee5b42c041ee
Message ID: <199707290149.DAA04300@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-29 02:06:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 10:06:46 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 10:06:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Will Spam For Food (Not Spam) / Re: Spare DigiCa$h? / Re: AN APPEAL TO THE HUMAN RACE
Message-ID: <199707290149.DAA04300@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



  I find it interesting that the cynical/sinister/paranoid cypherpunk
list members seem to be the ones who are most able to predict the
future trends of events on the Internet, particularly in areas which
surround very major and very minor issues. The Tim May's and Declan
McCullagh's shed interesting light on the future course of major events
while the Monger's and Dog Boy's turn their precognitive abilities in
the direction of the more mundane aspects of the Internet as a
reflection
of humanity/society.

  The "Spare DigiCa$h" post gave me pause to reflect how long it will be
before technology is sufficiently developed that when we hit our <Pause>
key, "CyberBums" will approach and offer to clean our video monitor with
an oily rag. Will we be cursed for offering CyberBums a form of e$pare-
change which cannot be spent on email-order wine? Will laws be passed
which prevent CyberBums from approaching us for e$pare-change within two
relay hops of an eCa$h site? Will CyberBums sort through our killfile
dumpsters for eTra$h?

  Was it Kevin Mitrick whose conditions of probation required him to
stay
off the Internet and away from computers? 
  Will the future bring laws which permit restraining orders against
individuals accessing certain parts of the Internet? Sex offenders/sex
sites; burglars/financial sites; pedophiles/children's sites?
  It seems to me that increasing regulations and laws surrounding the
access and use of the Internet will require strict laws requiring the
user to be able to show verification of identity/age/criminal history/
financial history/(approved government) reputation capital, and all
manner of information to place us all in categories needed to monitor
our compliance with laws and regulations.

  Once browsers are required by law to support a certain rating system
and children manage to get around it, there will no doubt be laws
passed requiring fascist monitoring of who is actually using the
software.(And LEA's who demand that phone companies provide them with
the ability to trace/locate cellular phone users will undoubtably want
the same capabilities with Internet users, in a war against anonymity.)

  There will be no shortage of James Love's, Kent Crispin's and Hallam-
Baker's to call for "reasonable compromise" in order to facilitate 
fascist censorship on things which we all "unambiguously" agree on
(by _their_ way of thinking, of course).
  The only way to prevent the atrocities perpetrated upon our rights
to freedom and liberty in physical space from becoming the norm in
CyberSpace is to fight against the systems, the governments and the
individuals who are striving to extend their fascist control by
building ElectroMagnetic Curtains in CyberSpace, is to prepare now
to fight against Electronic Oppression--to prepare for an Electronic
Revolution--now.

	CyhperDog
	~~~~~~~~~
{This post contains an Email Rating System classification of:
 Redundant Cowardly Anonymity.}
(This means than an Anonymous Coward is posting in reference to one
 of his/her own posts under a second anonymous pseudonym.)

--------------------------------
The first Anonymous Coward wrote:
> amaninneeeedeer443553444@aol.com wrote:
> > PLEASE HELP
> 
>   What follows is an example of the CyberBums predicted by one of the
> list members some time back. This A(ssh)OL(e) is using his spambot to
> "Spare change?" millions of people at a time and it turns out that
> besides his required, basic tale of woe, that he also has the proverbial
> parent who is dying from cancer.
> 
>   Don't send him any money.
>   Send *ME* money. I will use it to buy enough cheap wine to enable me
> to throw up on my shoes.
>   (Wouldn't you rather send your hard-earened money to an honest drunk
> than to a lying bum?)
> 
> CyberBum
> 
> -----
> > I WAS A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER IN THE ATLANTA AREA. I RAN THIS
> > BUSINESS SUCCESSFULLY UNTIL ABOUT 60 DAYS AGO. AT THAT TIME, 2
> > SEPARATE COMPANIES FILED BANKRUPTCY AGAINST ME FOR A TOTAL OF
> > $ 47,000. I COULDN'T SURVIVE THAT.
> >
> > CONSEQUENTLY, I WAS UNABLE TO PAY MY CREDITORS, MOST OF WHOM
> > WERE FRIENDS. THEY HAVE FAMILY AS I DO AND I CAN'T LIVE WITH THE
> > THOUGHT OF DOING TO THEM WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO ME. I'VE SPENT
> > MANY SLEEPLESS NIGHTS TRYING TO COME UP WITH A SOLUTION. I HAVE
> > NO WHERE TO TURN EXCEPT TO MY FELLOW MAN. MY ONLY FAMILY IS
> > MY FATHER. HE IS 74 AND SUFFERING FROM DIABETES AND PROSTATE
> > CANCER.
> >
> > I HAVE SLOD EVERYTHING EXCEPT THE CLOTHES OFF MY BACK AND MY
> > COMPUTER. AFTER THIS FINAL ATTEMPT FOR HELP, I WILL BE SELLING
> > IT.
> >
> > I WANT TO BE HONORABLE, BUT I CAN'T DO IT ALONE. I WOULD NEVER DO
> > THIS EXCEPT AS A LAST RESORT, BUT I KNOW THAT I WOULD HELP
> > SOMEONE IF I COULD.
> >
> > WILL YOU HELP ME?? ANY AMOUT WOULD BE VERY MUCH APPRECIATED.
> > THANK YOU
> >
> > W.E. HENDERSON
> > P.O. BOX 486
> > SMYRNA, GEORGIA 30081






Thread