From: Jason William RENNIE <jrennie@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a603ef2f7ba7658620f88b0237e69ef24db8c7ac89ff00522932fa8f500f811d
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970706142711.13496A-100000@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-06 04:46:04 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 12:46:04 +0800
From: Jason William RENNIE <jrennie@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 1997 12:46:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: The walsh report
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.970706142711.13496A-100000@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
To all aussie cypherpunks out there,
I was leafing through the walsh report. I dont follow it all very well.
could someone please answer one simple question.
The Walsh Report is good for cryptography and its ilk in Australia ??
Yes/No ??
I got the impression it was a yes, but i could be qrong i was just
readiong throught the conclusions
Jason
Return to July 1997
Return to “Jason William RENNIE <jrennie@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>”
1997-07-06 (Sun, 6 Jul 1997 12:46:04 +0800) - The walsh report - Jason William RENNIE <jrennie@hardy.ocs.mq.edu.au>