From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b3ad8d4877d909bceecc7102d3e80e6060ce122e8b5e98459a6ae4e0a4ea9625
Message ID: <199707030343.FAA29463@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-03 04:02:20 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 12:02:20 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 1997 12:02:20 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: PGP security problems?
Message-ID: <199707030343.FAA29463@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I saw this on another mailing list and was wondering if anyone has any
information as to what kind of security problems PGP had.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Due to security problems Pretty Good Privacy, Inc., will be using
a new signing key in our email correspondence, with an effective
date of July 1, 1997.
The new key can be downloaded from our keyserver at:
http://www.pgp.com
Any PGP Corporate key other than the following should be regarded
as having been revoked:
pub 1024/6C309BDF 1997/06/30
Pretty Good Privacy, Inc. Corporate Key <pgp@pgp.com>
All employee keys with pgp.com addresses should also be regarded
as having been revoked unless signed with the new Corporate Key.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBM7sc7UlfPVhsMJvfEQJMIACgwqhazDJfN6WqX2HBrq/klG0opmgAoOi6
btA8EoPROpqc9VA2V9fP1Nou
=v0eg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to July 1997
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
1997-07-03 (Thu, 3 Jul 1997 12:02:20 +0800) - PGP security problems? - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)