From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 02:08:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Cnet's stance on content filters
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970725105516.22013E-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 12:48:48 -0400
From: Lauren Gelman <gelman@acm.org>
To: declan@well.com
Subject: Cnet's stance on content filters

>Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 17:40:12 -0400
>To: chris_barr@cnet.com
>From: Lauren Gelman <gelman@acm.org>
>Subject: Cnet's stance on content filters
>Cc:
>Bcc:
>X-Attachments:
>
>with regard to: http://www.cnet.com/Content/Voices/Barr/072197/index.html
>
>First, I think there are a number of problems inherent in any content
>filtering system, some of which you discuss in your column.
>
>Given that, I think the main problem with the Internet Content Coalition
>approach is how, and who, will determine what is a "real news
>organization" is and what "bona fide news sites" are.  Is this the job of
>the ICC?  You completely ignore this issue both in the column and on the
>ICC web site.  What are the criteria that categorize Cnet as a "news
>organization?  Would EPIC and the ACLU (cited in your column) also fall
>under that category?  What about listservs where news is disseminated?
>
>The U.S. Public Policy Office for the Association for Computing (USACM)
>web site http://www.acm.org/usacm disseminates news about computer policy
>related issues as well as USACM position pieces on those issues.  It also
>archives back- issues of the "ACM Washington Update", a bi-weekly
>electronic newsletter.  Is the USACM web site a "bona fide news sites"?
>
>I believe these are important questions which need to be addressed before
>Cnet endorses any content-filtering approach to censorship. "Privilege"
>needs to be defined before Cnet or any other group can seek "to make sure
>that only real news organizations claim this privilege."
>
>
>-Lauren Gelman
>Associate Director
>USACM
>
>

/\ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Association for Computing,             +   http://www.acm.org/usacm/
Office of U.S. Public Policy           *   +1 202 544 4859 (tel)
666 Pennsylvania Ave., SE Suite 302 B  *   +1 202 547 5482 (fax)
Washington, DC 20003   USA             +   gelman@acm.org