From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ff187cb1d9df26b73d44380e9b157df17e2c7cbc4898a805827608802fd39a53
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970729100418.25915E-100000@well.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-29 17:24:49 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 01:24:49 +0800
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 01:24:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Boylovers, NAMBLA, and Net-vigilantes, from The Netly News
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970729100418.25915E-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 1997 10:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Subject: Boylovers, NAMBLA, and Net-vigilantes, from The Netly News
-----
http://pathfinder.com/netly/opinion/0,1042,1222,00.html
The Netly News (http://netlynews.com/)
July 29, 1997
This Boy-Lover's Life
by Declan McCullagh (declan@well.com)
Anne Cox is nothing if not determined. For months the
Net-vigilante has been unwavering in her crusade against pedophiles,
undaunted by insults, threats and even the "horrible things" done to
pictures of her as a baby that she had digitized and placed online.
She fought back with just about every possible tactic: argument,
public humiliation and sometimes-spurious threats of legal action.
Now, the war is escalating.
It started in May, after Cox launched an assault on "boy-lover"
web sites in an attempt to force them offline. But she and her allies
ran into a serious obstacle: the sites aren't illegal. They're filled
not with child pornography -- which is banned by federal law -- but,
instead, photos of boys in swimsuits. "They shouldn't be doing these
things with the children's pictures," Cox says.
[...]
Some argue that Cox and her allies have gone too far. Besides
boy-pix sites, this team of Net-vigilantes has attacked a group of gay
teens organizing "to fight against" discrimination. They've tried to
take down a consensual spanking page for gay adults, and even an
archive of sexually-explicit stories that specifically rejects tales
about pedophilia. Then there's the murky Children's Protection and
Advocacy Coalition, which Cox claims to run -- yet she refuses to name
its member organizations.
[...]
Return to July 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”