1997-08-15 - Re: PGP for palmtops?

Header Data

From: Mike <Michael.Johnson@mejl.com>
To: Nate Sammons <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 03a6710bba3cfb1532fb36b3150fa3d471c5312c2ac1f0eb0fc944270686b707
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19970815154731.00992100@localhost>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970815084615.13659A-100000@sulaco.proxicom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-15 14:09:13 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 22:09:13 +0800

Raw message

From: Mike <Michael.Johnson@mejl.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 22:09:13 +0800
To: Nate Sammons <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP for palmtops?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970815084615.13659A-100000@sulaco.proxicom.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19970815154731.00992100@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nate Sammons wrote:
>Does PGP exist for palmtops like the HP 320LX?  I would assume
(possibly
>foolishly) that the port would be easy, as they run Windows CE.

Probably not. Visual C++ for CE just came out this week
(http://www.microsoft.com/windowsce/developer/).

PGP for 16-bit DOS works fine on the HP 200LX, but it's painfully slow.
Decrypting a short message with a 2048 bit RSA key takes several
minutes.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBM/Rr08Uc8bdD9cnfEQLgxQCfWt/xsvs+4iaSjDqYNJJ8gRcw3BIAn20w
Sue31Ewi1n0wDqeSZsqUmI/x
=MB8v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Mike.






Thread