1997-08-23 - Shooting the taggers

Header Data

From: Wazoo MixMaster <mix@earth.wazoo.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1980dff0fd928e6ab29d0195340b1ba01fb4baed5517ddaeea6d20ab412c9832
Message ID: <199708230816.IAA24167@earth.wazoo.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-23 14:36:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 22:36:40 +0800

Raw message

From: Wazoo MixMaster <mix@earth.wazoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 22:36:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Shooting the taggers
Message-ID: <199708230816.IAA24167@earth.wazoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




Tim May wrote:
> And yet can J. Random Businessman defend his property against this
> defacing? Nope. The cops say "Let us handle crimes." But they don't.
>
> There's a solution for taggers: snipers.

There appears to be a wonderful market for long-range nonlethal
stun weapons. I wonder, if a tagger is marking your building,
would it be legal to stun him from a distance and then call the
cops?

Rape can be argued to be deserving of serious punishment of some kind,
but would tagging deserve death when a nonlethal option exist? Could
not the woman stun the rapist and then call the cops?

-THE LIE






Thread