From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 1a512c1c867f2be0a10139f0885a370935f5569e848bc560b61b56dfa0a95209
Message ID: <4624afc117cc70ecd2729a840f5d3e21@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-28 01:36:09 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 09:36:09 +0800
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 09:36:09 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Socio-Economic Cults (Re: Cypherpunk Cults)
Message-ID: <4624afc117cc70ecd2729a840f5d3e21@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Sean Roach <roach_s@alph.swosu.edu> wrote:
>>Afterwards, a compensation arrangement is made between your
>>protection company and the protection company of your victim.
>Also, according to what I remember, the "protection company" was your
>extended family. Pay up or face the wraith of all the deceased's
>cousins, nephews, uncles, neices, aunts, maybe his kids.
This seems to have been a common case, but it was not the rule.
There were a limited number of franchises available for protection
companies. Protection franchises were bought and sold like any other
business. Like businesses, some did well and grew in size and value
under the care of their stewards and others did not.
The ability to change protection companies at will is important - it's
what distinguishes this system from feudal "protection" systems where
the "clients" are actually serfs.
The Icelandic idea of the extended family did not map precisely to
ours. Divorces were easily and commonly arranged. There was a lot of
turnover and a lot of half-siblings around. There were some
interesting adoption customs, too. People sometimes adopted children
they liked, even if the parents were still living. This did not mean
that the children didn't continue to live with the natural parents.
But the adopting parent would help out here and there. (In "Njal's
Saga", for example, an adopting parent beats up people for his adopted
daughter and this causes no end of trouble.)
Just Another Cypherpunk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBNASrX/+1rw4IkyBFAQGkcgf/UPot2diIVhohhip4CQDpUnGdZZA9TCK6
OPAsNb01CekDk8fv0SThudb9jSf5/QFEkZ6OM/ts2f5hbpxwGx6zC+sMJ9oo+LsI
4odgrR2lbwdikgMBDoJ3FcJMOF9bKLnUPYBUUc/RwPP0b7Jj8FEfDxURu+yHAUR7
VRRxmtyWMHSp7j+2Ngz8Idu7CJHqUfekcuSdPKank3QaXO9nEDDnWsoWK94UWBrh
ZJPYo1D1TgdP/0LxjoU4FH2Tq9AZYVrZ8jxXxDShzS2mVR9jhGu31HBcQ/povEYC
w/BoG/6kA59bmfvV8odU/q5CM9vFuJmLb8Swtc7YZXal5a6v2KX5+g==
=MFgT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to August 1997
Return to “Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>”
1997-08-28 (Thu, 28 Aug 1997 09:36:09 +0800) - Re: Socio-Economic Cults (Re: Cypherpunk Cults) - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>