From: "Peter Trei" <trei@process.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 23:26:47 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Socio-Economic Cults (Re: Cypherpunk Cults)
Message-ID: <199708291518.IAA23272@rigel.cyberpass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> Date:          Thu, 28 Aug 1997 18:17:09 -0500 (CDT)
> From:          snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
> To:            John Smith <jsmith58@hotmail.com>
> Cc:            cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
> Subject:       Re: Socio-Economic Cults (Re: Cypherpunk Cults)
> Reply-to:      snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>

> On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, John Smith wrote:
"Snow" wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, John Smith wrote:
> > "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>:
> > >>You stole from me.
> > >>*BANG*
> > >>You raped my sister
> > >>*BANG*
> > >or threaten me or my family you have committed suicide.
> > >It is a quite simple and effective philosophy: 
> > >"You fuck with me, my family, or my property you die. You leave me alone
> > >and I leave you alone."
> > >Even someone like you can understand such a philosophy.
> > Well, I can't.  It's very confusing.  Are there judges in your
> > philosophy, or do you just decide for yourself who to shoot?
> > "You walked on my property."  BANG.
> 
> 	Works for me. You post no trespassing, I have no excuse. 
> 
> > "Your music kept me awake all night."  BANG.
> 
> 	Well, turn the shit down. 
> 
> > "I warned you to cut that tree down, and now it fell on my house."
> > BANG.
> 
> 	If the warning was issued, then *BANG*. 


"We, your neighbours, have decided that you're too f*cking 
trigger-happy. So we're solving the problem. Permanently."
                        BANG!

-------------

Peter Trei
trei@process.com