1997-08-08 - Re: Clinton’s threat of line-item veto affect crypto bill?

Header Data

From: frissell@panix.com
To: hua@chromatic.com>
Message Hash: 2d71dfea7e01b1ade6c1ba7ac8af8fdf2ae82250885707c00281be17fe830ab7
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970807195514.037903ac@panix.com>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19970807082355.00708b40@best.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-08 07:44:12 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 15:44:12 +0800

Raw message

From: frissell@panix.com
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 1997 15:44:12 +0800
To: hua@chromatic.com>
Subject: Re: Clinton's threat of line-item veto affect crypto bill?
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970807082355.00708b40@best.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970807195514.037903ac@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 01:34 PM 8/7/97 -0700, geeman@best.com wrote:
>Read my earlier post re: this.  Clinton already said he'd veto SAFE.

Yes, "Fighting Bill" Clinton may be the one who saves us from outlawing 
crypto used in the course of a crime.  Then when the courts throw the export 
ban out...


DCF
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM+pgYIVO4r4sgSPhAQFOiAP/ZsHiaf8y1mFxoCW0N6h4p6vjvd/mm9YV
ZPy76w2NIVkVSKGLFm4xOmd2mPo2gpoG1Bgcdxj8Q2SQFOqbSkhnkPbOcf332JG8
IJaEM4cKRZfYlnk5sZiIKXUZsK/w10B/AH42gibqctI1f7yS5Ijs5B5eenc/6u9X
mpUg4P3wz70=
=2QJm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread