From: John Kelsey <kelsey@plnet.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 02:00:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Subject: Re: Eternity Uncensorable?
Message-ID: <MAPI.Id.0016.00656c73657920204130443930303042@MAPI.to.RFC822>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[ To: cypherpunks@algebra.com, Wei Dai ## Date: 08/08/97 10:37 pm ##
  Subject: Re: Eternity Uncensorable? ]

>Subject: Re: Eternity Uncensorable?
>To: Cypherpunks Lite <cp-lite@comsec.com>
>From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
>Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 11:33:55 -0700 (PDT)

>I suggest using information dispersal to spread risk amongst
>remailer operators.  Use Rabin's information dispersal technique
>to divide up a document into n shares such that k of them can
>reconstruct the original, and post each share via a seperate
>remailer.  It would be hard for the government to single out an
>operator to go after since an individual share by itself is
>useless.

I'm a little concerned with the usefulness of this idea in a
legal sense.  Imagine the physical analogue:  Alice buys the
guns and masks, and leaves them in a pre-arranged place.  Bob
anonymously buys a car and leaves it, with the keys inside, in
another pre-arranged place.  Carol and Dave collect the guns,
masks, and the car, and use them to rob a bank or hijack an
airplane.  Do you suppose the feds will have any problem
prosecuting Alice and Bob for their part in the conspiracy?

>If n>k this also increases reliability and resilience of the
>eternity service against technical attacks.

This part is somewhat more useful.  However, n copies of the
message are probably better.

I think the general problem here is unsolveable--running an
Eternity server is just going to be a dangerous thing to do if
you live somewhere where the police are likely to see
possessing, distributing, or selling some of the information on
it as a crime.  There are two possible solutions I can see:
Either make Eternity servers so widespread that taking down
individual servers in individual jurisdictions is futile, or
find some jurisdictions where virtually *nothing* will provoke
the police to act.  (Note that legal jurisdiction isn't the only
issue here.  Some groups may be willing to use terrorist tactics
to shut down these servers.)

Note:  Please respond via e-mail as well as or instead of posting,
as I get CP-LITE instead of the whole list.

   --John Kelsey, kelsey@counterpane.com
 PGP 2.6 fingerprint = 4FE2 F421 100F BB0A 03D1 FE06 A435 7E36

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBM/ChJUHx57Ag8goBAQFTdwP/cX/+SsXEkjmSrTYcvSBP9bHsAzRcXs+z
FmPIq1dd9T7Mm6tlJGe8iC4lXmpm4JVqhmZMTGoJlkw6ld1MWGiOevpDWhycpAPQ
6ohDd/R2G3dRHkWCvPklyeKQx3v8GfWAhPrupJZNNAUCIJqDMlg6kJQv4BDiEukr
G7C89qeaXqA=
=WXLf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


   --John Kelsey, Counterpane Systems, kelsey@counterpane.com
 PGP 2.6 fingerprint = 4FE2 F421 100F BB0A 03D1 FE06 A435 7E36