1997-08-03 - Re: NIST request for comments

Header Data

From: Charles <apache@bear.apana.org.au>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 346b62b16541e5969c2a79199c31664b0ae522e5e4d9cee7bfdb324b604b15ab
Message ID: <199708030532.PAA05857@bear.apana.org.au>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19970802203556.00b1e180@cybercash.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-03 05:39:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 13:39:11 +0800

Raw message

From: Charles <apache@bear.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 13:39:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: NIST request for comments
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19970802203556.00b1e180@cybercash.com>
Message-ID: <199708030532.PAA05857@bear.apana.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


   Carl Ellison said:

> On http://csrc.ncsl.nist.gov/ , the 3rd and 4th links are to requests for 
> comments on changes to encryption standards.  Apparently, NIST isn't getting 
> many comments and would really like some.

It'll only encourage them to believe they're relevant.
 
> Maybe someone should tell them that publication in the Federal Register isn't 
> the right way to communicate with netizens :)

The fact that they haven't already indicates they're dinosaurs.
- -- 
   .////.   .//    Charles Senescall             apache@bear.apana.org.au
 o:::::::::///                                   apache@quux.apana.org.au
>::::::::::\\\     Finger me @bear for PGP PUBKEY      Brisbane AUSTRALIA
   '\\\\\'   \\    Apache



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBM+QX2Hawhvoxf0r9AQEa3QgAgKxZYfGKicVg8+uZXOHGKaZSFZCPn7oe
jekWdd5w2uC6lWk+YAVrghm6qt26b98IwUy8P1Ft9cIjn4LC5kjU+A74DURlKXhZ
KtidkyUcdWAuTmGW4R0IK/1vUgusI9D5S9KO6U4iUD17PqoUCU43xz5IKHgKZodd
SlcaWFZdIhiJMkmTJaaFXAUTapm5Zszq2iZjM9yu+gFy8Gvq1+CPojrTdduzCl8w
fqxQMvK0GiinDXmAxhVdJXPk6nqQEYeSk3JIJsY/QgOfnaq8kwZYfvmfEm1LdEHz
ij2i5jhkJbsO2PFFSSz3bL5U6bR6AFQYop2qoLGgV67mNmR04OJfWg==
=AziQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread