1997-08-17 - Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh on McVeigh

Header Data

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
To: Neva Remailer <nobody@neva.org>
Message Hash: 395a9ff7ff55ba6a598fe90e85ad871ac9f3f430159743bcc975ae41f995791c
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970816215017.507A-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Reply To: <199708161327.IAA18154@dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-17 03:33:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 11:33:03 +0800

Raw message

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 11:33:03 +0800
To: Neva Remailer <nobody@neva.org>
Subject: Re: FCPUNX:McVeigh on McVeigh
In-Reply-To: <199708161327.IAA18154@dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970816215017.507A-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




>   McVeigh's conviction was a given, no matter how skilled an attorney
> he had representing him. That's how it works at that level.

Given that he appears to have actually been guilty, and was not tried in 
California, perhaps he would have been convivted regardless of how much 
was spent on his defense.

The O.J. trial should not be used as a legal standard; it was a media 
event, not a trial, with book deals for winners and losers alike.






Thread