From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4bd8a9bb8bf1f979428595b27393e3e2ed84517a6b111aabe6b69037557147da
Message ID: <97b37fa0770bb495c09fe9f5401db7df@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-31 13:46:52 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 21:46:52 +0800
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 21:46:52 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: None
Message-ID: <97b37fa0770bb495c09fe9f5401db7df@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 01:09 PM 8/25/97 +1000, you wrote:
>> So what you are saying then is that when the scum inserts a toilet plunger
>> up someone's butt you consider them less than human, therefore all of
>> humanity becomes less than human including the plunging scum, therefore
>> he himself is less than human...
>
>Ok I'll take this slowly
>
>1) All of humanity is equaliy human
I can generally agree with that
>2) If someone is made less then human then we all become less human by
>that amount
Oh, kind of like that "ruin it for everyone" idea.
>For esample if Alice, Bob and Paul all have say 10 units of humanity. Now
>Paul shoves a plunger up Bobs datehole, we could say that Paul should
>have 5 units of humanity. By rule one every body else is now also 5
>units.
Um, Dave, it doesn't work like that. Alice didn't do anything, and Bob was
victimized, anyway. The only person who should be less human is Paul.
>As you can planly see assining humanitiy and inhumanity is a pointless
>esasize.
And the platypus should refrain from saying crap like this in the future.
I for one have no idea how this could be the system for assigning inhumanity.
Bad Cypherpunk!!! No Security!!
Return to August 1997
Return to “Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>”
1997-08-31 (Sun, 31 Aug 1997 21:46:52 +0800) - None - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>