1997-08-17 - Re: Missed a PGP version?

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: “David Downey” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 57b93e5b48c4dae09a33bb7f848cdbe39fa24336eb69107e72579fb98209c94d
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970817062449.006fd06c@netcom10.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199708171239.FAA05942@f31.hotmail.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-17 13:41:00 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 21:41:00 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 21:41:00 +0800
To: "David Downey" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Missed a PGP version?
In-Reply-To: <199708171239.FAA05942@f31.hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970817062449.006fd06c@netcom10.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 05:39 AM 8/17/97 PDT, David Downey wrote:
>   The version numbers of PGP floated from PGP 2.63i to PGP 5.0i. Did I 
>miss a version or was this done to reflect the start of the break from 
>the RSALIB algorythm? Also, does PGP 5.0 still support the MPLIB? Was it 
>used in it's design?

PGP 5.0 is the software formerly known as PGP 3.0. Viacrypt, which sold
commercial PGP licenses before PGP, Inc. was formed, used to sell a PGP 4.x
GUI version based on 2.63 core. Rather than trying to explain to their
customers why 3.0 was more advanced than 4.5, PGP, Inc decided to name the
rewrite 5.0.


--Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
  PGP encrypted mail preferred.
  DES is dead! Please join in breaking RC5-56.
  http://rc5.distributed.net/






Thread