1997-08-20 - Re: David Downey asks to be shot

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 685d74880190228b4d2ab82aef3d22b7ff15405b2bd4f42144d4f169fcb2d03d
Message ID: <199708200541.HAA16921@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-20 05:54:19 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 13:54:19 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 13:54:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: David Downey asks to be shot
Message-ID: <199708200541.HAA16921@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Tim May wrote:
> 
> At 6:23 AM -0700 8/19/97, David D.W.Downey wrote:
> >blackjack@hotmail.com wrote:
> >> Saw your post in the newsgroups.
> >> Check this out!
> >  Ya know, this shit really pisses me off. I understand that we have to
> >protect everyone's rights if we wish are own to be protected.
> > I understand that we have to protect the enemies'
> >rights too, but can't we just shoo a few of them first? Lowers the
> >numbers needing protection and might help us out in the end.

> I agree. We should shoot a few of the enemies first.
> I suggest you be shot.

  Better yet, let's shoot the people "needing protection."
  Once they're dead, there will be no need for all those laws
designed to protect them.

  What a brilliant idea! I'll probably get the Nobel Peace Prize
for this one!

FuckingForVirginityMonger







Thread