From: Irwan Hadi <phoenix@cutey.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 72aa858c54d851b03a93b10760a5712da9356a20baab41ee3062548e2c4b0bf3
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19970820191650.04b68804@mail.bit.net.id>
Reply To: <19970817123643.13713.qmail@hotmail.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-20 16:10:19 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 00:10:19 +0800
From: Irwan Hadi <phoenix@cutey.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 00:10:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP5i supports RSA keys?
In-Reply-To: <19970817123643.13713.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19970820191650.04b68804@mail.bit.net.id>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 05:36 17/08/97 PDT, David Downey wrote:
>Yes, PGP 5.0i does support the RSALIB. Even though you can generate
>RSALIB based keys, why do so when there is a newer and better
algorythm
>supplied with the 5.0? Albiet it is nice to have the support as not
>everyone has converted over, I still prefer the newer one. 4096 bit
keys
>are going to be rather hard to break in this lifetime. :-)
but to generate and signing a message with 4096 bits key , will take
much times, than with 2048 or 1024
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBM/p9wlFJDOlka9UjEQJ9OACfWHOPXiv2uiGsoGi2wXjbRBwJA7IAoNLI
vpoeaqvnIPlJ24+7srQMFDTW
=yLCE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to August 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”