1997-08-29 - Re: p.s. – Re: ASK ToolKit Clarifications

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: Myron Lewis <mrlewis@keygen.com
Message Hash: 7699ac9a10d652a6457662d54755ccef2cf2ca6856f179dae40cc63a599e8804
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970829091223.0072c1bc@netcom10.netcom.com>
Reply To: <19970829133319.AAA17639@mrlewis.tiac.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-29 16:44:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1997 00:44:17 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1997 00:44:17 +0800
To: Myron Lewis <mrlewis@keygen.com
Subject: Re: p.s. -- Re: ASK ToolKit Clarifications
In-Reply-To: <19970829133319.AAA17639@mrlewis.tiac.net>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970829091223.0072c1bc@netcom10.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 07:50 AM 8/29/97 -0600, Myron Lewis wrote:
>Myron Lewis wrote: 
>> I know that the claims we make for the ASK ToolKit(TM) sound a little too
>> good to be true.  In fact, someone I have been talking to for a while about
>> other subjects and who I thought respected my views told me that "If it
>> sounds too good to be true, it probably is-- too good to be true. "
>
>I forgot to mention...it can also be used to break PGP encryption.

When making such strong claims, it would behoove the author to provide an
example.

Until such time, the ASK toolkit will be justly regarded as snakeoil.


--Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
  PGP encrypted mail preferred.
  DES is dead! Please join in breaking RC5-56.
  http://rc5.distributed.net/






Thread