cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-08-23 - Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to “court (fwd)

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 7c9b0223e47c6b9ac7def77dbde3f89b4860957091f9ae4238a7325b7e66c843
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970823134841.0073cc78@netcom10.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199708231858.NAA25765@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-23 20:56:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 04:56:09 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 04:56:09 +0800
To: Jim Choate <cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199708231858.NAA25765@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970823134841.0073cc78@netcom10.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 01:58 PM 8/23/97 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
>This I agree with completely. At no point in the Constitution does it give
>the federal government the job of welfare. It also does not provide for any
>mechanism for law enforcement (ie DEA, NSA, FBI, etc.) outside of taxes and
>inter-state commerce.

So we are all in agreement:  when I mentioned Norplant briefly being a
precondition for receiving welfare benefits, I was talking about a example
that I recall to have occurred in a single state. [I can't remember the
state. Anyone?] It appears you agree that States are allowed by the US
Constitution to impose such requirements, subject to the state's own
constitutions.


--Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
  PGP encrypted mail preferred.
  DES is dead! Please join in breaking RC5-56.
  http://rc5.distributed.net/

Thread