1997-08-24 - Re: Reproductive Rights and State Benefits (fwd)

Header Data

From: Mac Norton <mnorton@cavern.uark.edu>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Message Hash: 7d30df39793d0545fb67a76f33b2d037eb81be7574f215c3de0d1ec125358fb1
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970824005606.1898C-100000@cavern.uark.edu>
Reply To: <199708240529.AAA28585@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-24 06:03:35 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 14:03:35 +0800

Raw message

From: Mac Norton <mnorton@cavern.uark.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 14:03:35 +0800
To: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Subject: Re: Reproductive Rights and State Benefits (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199708240529.AAA28585@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970824005606.1898C-100000@cavern.uark.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Sun, 24 Aug 1997, Jim Choate wrote:
> 
> The original Constitution already had a clause applying the Constitution
> and all laws derived from it to the states and preventing judges or other
> agencies from bypassing them. So, given that such extensions were already
> in place just what does the 14th do?

Well, quite a bit actually, as interpreted by the SCt.  It makes
many, perhaps all, of the Bill of Rights prohibitions on Congress
applicable to state gov'ts as well.  Art. VI, to which I think
you refer, does not do so of its own accord.
MacN






Thread