cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-08-20 - Re: Status of Cypherpunks list sites?

Header Data

From: Apache <apache@bear.apana.org.au>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 81c9516eaab9bde774c4172c994b6d0371705fe340d2c36ca2cab6f3ff66b85d
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970820164757.5594B-100000@bear.apana.org.au>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970820152437.5044B-100000@bear.apana.org.au>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-20 07:09:46 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 15:09:46 +0800

Raw message

From: Apache <apache@bear.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 15:09:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Status of Cypherpunks list sites?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970820152437.5044B-100000@bear.apana.org.au>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970820164757.5594B-100000@bear.apana.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Apache wrote:

> subscriber to cyberpass as apache@quux.. and I get that mail fairly
> promptly but under this nicks sub to cyberpass (much lower down on the
> list of subscribers) the latency is usually in hours (4-8) with 

Well this post took 1.5 hours to turn around.

In any case toad is in general much faster for me. Anyone else (besides
JY) find this to be the case?

Thread